“I believe in the imagination. What I cannot see is infinitely more important than what I can see.” Duane Michals
I think Michals' claim is quite interesting. To some degree I agree with this statement. Since photography is more about visual sensation, the interpretation can be varied by different viewers. Even literature has the same character, because not only the author creates the work, but also the reader or the viewer put their imagination and interpretation into it as well. What we see physically is just a vehicle which conveys emotion and information, but the imagination behind the visual elements adds more flavor to the picture we see. Every viewer has his/her own imagination about the same photo. That's what creates dynamics of the artwork.
I think Michals' claim is quite interesting. To some degree I agree with this statement. Since photography is more about visual sensation, the interpretation can be varied by different viewers. Even literature has the same character, because not only the author creates the work, but also the reader or the viewer put their imagination and interpretation into it as well. What we see physically is just a vehicle which conveys emotion and information, but the imagination behind the visual elements adds more flavor to the picture we see. Every viewer has his/her own imagination about the same photo. That's what creates dynamics of the artwork.
No comments:
Post a Comment